Thursday, November 20, 2008

Yet Another Unethical And Illegal Response From Re-Bath. It Just Keeps Getting Worse.

We again get a response from Heidi. Remember, she did not have the authority, just a little while ago. Now she’s in charge again? What?

Who the heck is really in charge there? Pass the buck. Waste the customer’s time. Lie to their face. Don’t return phone calls. Claim you are the one who has authority. Claim you have no authority. Claim the fax machine is lying. Claim the customer is lying. Claim you only have authority again. Lie, lie, lie.

The product is a sham, the business is a scam. Re-Bath is a terrible company and the people that work it have proven to us that they sleazy jerks with no morals or ethics.

She wrote and sent the below email to us some time after 4:00PM. Had we not stayed late at work, we would not have seen this until sometime the next morning.

Again, this was sent with less than a four hour required response time or they would “cease all communication”. :

“Your email was forwarded to me, and here is Re-Bath, LLC’s response:
Attached is our final offer. You may return this to us via fax, by 8:00pm tonight and we will issue you a check for $5,050.00. This agreement cannot be altered or we will not accept it. If we do not receive the agreement by 8:00pm tonight, we will cease all communication with you and we will not make any future offers.
Our fax number is (480) 833-7199.
Regards,
Heidi Seyler
Re-Bath, LLC”


Who the hell do they think they are? THEY DON’T HAVE THE RIGHT TO MAKE OR ENFORCE THAT DEMAND! What unethical CHEATS!

A business or person cannot make demands like this legally. But this is Re-Bath, dishonest and operating in this bullying illegal manner to the end.

Not only is it illegal, there is no way anyone could remotely consider this is an ethical way to do business. They know they are creating an artificial deadline that is impossible to uphold in a court of law.

But then we already know perjury is common conversation for them from our experience first hand in court with Re-Bath agents. So why would we think if we ended up in court again they would remotely tell the truth? Absolutely despicable behavior.

They should be ashamed of themselves, but that would mean they have a conscience, trust us, they have repeatedly shown us they do not. They do have a lot of people’s money they have traded for a crappy low quality product, and apparently that drives them to continue to screw anyone they can.
But if that is all they have, and a sleazy work ethic, why not take it as far as they can. It’s not like it going to hurt their reputation, they’ll just lie some more.

Avoid this company and the scams they perpetrate on unsuspecting and trusting citizens. We learned the hard way Re-Bath will most likely screw you like they did us if you decide to use them.

Monday, November 10, 2008

Talk about dishonest and unethical practices, (Talk about Re-Bath…)

The following day, after not accepting our phone calls, we received this from Heidi:

“From: Heidi Seyler [mailto:hseyler@rebath.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 9:09 AM
Subject: Re-Bath

The agreement that was faxed into us was amended from the original version of what was sent to you. Due to the fact that our General Release was not returned to us by 5:00pm on June 18th, 2008 we are considering our offer null and void and no further offers will be made.

Regards,
Heidi Seyler
Re-Bath, LLC”


Cowards and cheats. They refuse to speak with us. Since it was obvious Heidi was not mature enough or even had the authority we were led to believe she had, we had to contact the president and vice president of Re-Bath. Turns out these guys are just as cowardly apparently as they refuse to speak with us too.

You’d think they would want to resolve this, especially since it is 100% their fault. What a group of disgusting scheming cheaters and liars.
But they have our money and we need it to repair the damage they have caused.

Our response to these underhanded jerks was still civil and polite and fully clarified what had truthfully transpired.

Dated 6-19-08:

“Mr. Sanders, Mr. Murdock,We are very disappointed in the way this situation is being handled. Mr. Murdock, you stated "We would like to resolve these issues quickly to avoid any further delay & make sure you are fully satisfied."
When are you going to fulfill that statement? We, in good faith, did what we were asked to do by Heidi, met the time constraint of faxing the signed document, (See Heidi's email below. Heidi made no mention of requirements other than "by end of business day", and no time even mentioned at that.), only to have her deny the agreement by claiming she not to receive it by 5:00PM June 18th, 2008. And then claiming it was denied because it was altered. Nothing in her instructions prohibited altering the document in any way.
In actuality, Re-Bath's offer sent on 6-17-08 was a modified version of an offer we sent on 6-13-08. If you can modify the document for a counter offer, why can't we? We are only trying to make a fair agreement with you.
The fact is the fax was sent and confirmed received at the fax number provided by Heidi before 8:39AM June 18th, 2008. That provided Re-Bath with an entire day to contact us if there were any issues. We complied fully to the requirements given to us, (read the email).
Denial on the grounds she stated is not acceptable or part of the agreement. Nothing states we could not make a counter offer, or that such an offer would result in voiding the agreement or absolving Re-Bath of their responsibility. And it does not absolve Re-Bath of compensating us for the damages they caused to our home.
The changes made to the document reflected the oral offer made to me by Mr. Murdock during our phone conversation on 6-10-08. The original oral agreement protected only Re-Bath Corporate, and Re-Bath San Diego, not Re-Bath of CA. The document was corrected only to clarify and reflect that agreement and still does protect Re-Bath corporate and Re-Bath S.D.
To deny it wholly on the grounds stated by Heidi is without merit and counter to our original discussions and intentions. It appears too many people are involved in this and are not sharing between them the information discussed with me.
Re-Bath had well over eight hours to respond yesterday if something needed to be addressed. An oral offer was made to us for $5050.00. We compromised and accepted it. A written offer that was not clear was sent, we returned it well with in the time frame with clarifications, no restrictions were placed on the document being returned adjusted for accuracy of the oral offer. We expect you to honor your word and warranty.”

But sadly, they are not an honorable company…

Tuesday, November 4, 2008

Is That The Light At The End Of The Tunnel? YES, But It’s Not Daylight, It’s A Train and We’re About To Get Railroaded!

On 6-17-08 we received this email:

“Attached is our final offer regarding the resolution of your complaint against Re-Bath of California. This includes the Manufacturing Lifetime Warranty on the Re-Bath products. Please sign and return this agreement to us by end of business day Wednesday, June 18th, 2008. Once this is signed and returned to us, a check will be issued to you and a copy of the warranty will be sent with it.
Please let me know if you have any further questions.
Regards,
Heidi Seyler
Re-Bath, LLC
P. (800) 426-4573 ext. 112
F. (480) 833-7199”


After having the “agreement” (Maybe Re-Bath should look up the word agreement so they can understand it constitutes a meeting of the minds.) reviewed by legal counsel it was suggested a minor change should be made as the way it was written was not a balance offer by any means.

In fact said counsel used the legal term of “That is a Bullshit document, and who ever wrote it knows it.”

The minor change did not negate the intent, just slightly protected us in an area that was very unlikely to even occur, but would cause Re-Bath no harm, unless they were guilty of doing what they claimed they did not and were not doing. And even in that case it still would probably been a moot point. Is there enough double talk in there?


The fact that they refused to accept it and denied receiving it speaks volumes to their motives and intentions.


On 6-19-08 we received this untruthful email. (The claim that it was not received by 5:00PM is a total lie as we have the fax confirmation that it was received well before 9:00AM on the 18th of June 2008):

“The agreement that was faxed into us was amended from the original version of what was sent to you.
Due to the fact that our General Release was not returned to us by 5:00pm on June 18th, 2008 we are considering our offer null and void and no further offers will be made.
Regards,
Heidi Seyler
Re-Bath, LLC “



Notice they are canceling their warranty because they claim we did not meet the unfair short term arbitrary time frame they demanded that we meet, even though we indeed met it.

The warranty is not something they have the right to cancel. They are liable, PERIOD!

To claim we lost our chance at collecting by not meeting their arbitrary and unlawful deadline (when we have written documentation that we did) is flat out dishonest.

They don’t even have the right to demand that we meet that short deadline especially since it was made by sending a blind email!

WHAT A BUNCH OF RE-BATH! We are sure this is the way they treat the majority of the customers they cheat. It is astounding the lies they tell, and they can’t even keep them consistent.

If you are unfortunate enough to contract with them, the odds of you being treated like this, or Heaven forbid worse, are quite great.